Democratic lawmakers have faced eruptions of anger at town hall meetings across the country this week, as constituents have coupled their fury over President Donald Trump’s actions with deep frustration over what they see as a feckless Democratic response.

  • Intergalactic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Time for the neoliberal world order to end. Want Republicans to actually be scared of Democrats? Fill the party with socialists.

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 days ago

      This is correct. Ultimately, the Democratic Party will only be changed through primaries. Not town halls or performative third party voting, but filling the party up with people who think differently.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        Democratic Party will only be changed through primaries

        And that means it’s time for everyone to actually give a shit about voting in primary elections instead of just old people who keep choosing the worst candidates.

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            While I agree, I’m a “child of the internet” so pretty much any opposition research on me would have me murdered by probably everyone.

            Maybe I should run. I could unite the left and right in their disgust of me lol

              • Optional@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                Oh! NOW I remember why I didn’t give my real name and all my friends and activities and locations and menstrual cycles and everything to BlackmailBook when they demanded it of me to view the link my grandma sent me.

                JFC Why won’t this fucking thing burn to the ground.

                • Jarix@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  Because you still need it. When you stop needing it it will end. Even if the bed is only one of delusion

      • Intergalactic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        That will never happen regardless, as long as money influences politics, both parties will never represent the people.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          All you have to do is raise money without corporations.

          How hard could it be?

          Edit: /s ffs

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          And as long as privately ran organization owned by those rich people (the DNC) controls the primaries then they can choose what ever candidates they want. Like how they chose Hillary despite Bernie having more support in 2016. This is why the DNC has stopped doing primaries.

          • KALDON@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            When did they stop? If you’re talking about last time around, unfortunately Biden didn’t drop out early enough for them to have one. We will definitely have primaries coming up. Will the DNC try to put their finger on the scale? Surely. But that just means we got to show up in bigger numbers than they think.

            • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              Bernie had provably more individual donors than any canidate in US history.

              There’s no amount pf voting that makes the DNCs chosen canidate lose the primary.

              They are a private organization that doesn’t have to even have a primary, the primary exists to hold up the illusion of choice.

              • KALDON@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                11 days ago

                Nah, these people are plenty beatable. And donations aren’t votes.

                And there absolutely will be primaries.

                • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  The DNC will not allow the party to leave Neoliberal ownership.

                  They will rig it in favor of their canidate just like in 2016, and then try to guilt us into supporting them.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Ultimately, the Democratic Party will only be changed through primaries.

        Only so far as they continue to hold and respect them. We’re now 0/3 on that front, so… yeah. It’s not impossible, but they’ll fight you every step of the way and then some. Creating/hijacking a third party and strategically contesting election will probably accomplish your goals faster. Remember that the only reason the GOP was taken over twice was because the party leadership approved of it.

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Not just presidential matters. Local and state are much less fucked with. A 3rd party in first past the post just creates a split of neolib/socialists while the fascists remain united. Division in the American system is just a way to have the other party win. Republicans allowed the Tea party because that is what they wanted as well. Neolibs won’t allow a split progressive/socialist with the exception of Bernie (because how do you fuck with Vermont).

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            A 3rd party in first past the post just creates a split of neolib/socialists while the fascists remain united.

            If you start local and strategically spread (or create a mass movement and go for the jugular) you can remove the neoliberals from the equation and make socialists and fascists the only two choices.

            • Lyrl@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              Or work to implement ranked choice voting. The more localities use it, the more comfortable people get with it (the primary anti-ranked choice argument is it’s “too confusing for voters”), the more chance it has to be adopted by more states beyond the current Maine and Alaska beachhead.

              • Logi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                And. And work to implement ranked choice voting. The FPTP system is the root of all this. The reason you can’t realistically consider voting for a third party, and why those who did (or sat home since they had nothing realistic to vote for) handed power to Trump.

                But all that will take time and is not going to help in the next couple of elections. So there also needs to be a short to medium term plan.

        • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          I’m not talking about Presidential primaries. I’m talking about state and local. Make it so the Democratic Party is full of progressives, socialists, social democrats, whatever your favorite brand of left-wing politics is. I’d be dammed careful about communists because that word is a fucking non-starter with the American electorate. Hell socialism is as well but it’s not as poisonous as communism. When the party is full of… I don’t know the proper term because every word I think to use (leftist? Lefties, maybe?) has been co-opted to mean a specific ideology. But make it so the Democratic Party as a whole leans further left, and those people have to be tapped to fill key roles because their presence is so large.

          You are absolutely wrong about creating/hacking third party. Ross Perot couldn’t pull it off despite spending about 80% what the major parties spent and capturing nearly 19% of votes in a vastly more friendly media environment. In order to achieve just that lofty level of irrelevance, a third party candidate would have to spend about $350 million and buy Fox News or Facebook. Third party isn’t going to happen. Presidential primary isn’t the place to start.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Make it so the Democratic Party is full of progressives, socialists, social democrats, whatever your favorite brand of left-wing politics is.

            The problem is that they’ll, again, fight you every step of the way. An ideological takeover will have to happen over their dead bodies, and meanwhile they’ll keep demanding concessions so they don’t expel you from the party and disallow you from running for primaries. The crux of the issue with the ideological takeover route is that this contradiction will lose you legitimacy in the eyes of your supporters as you’re forced into compromise after compromise in order not to alienate the neoliberals, and they’ll give you fucking nothing in return.

            Ross Perot couldn’t pull it off despite spending about 80% what the major parties spent and capturing nearly 19% of votes in a vastly more friendly media environment.

            Uh… obviously you can’t win an election with only 19% of the vote?

          • notabot@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            This is way. Democrat voters want change, but they’re not speaking to the system in a language it understands. The party changes not from the top down, but from the bottom up. That only happens when people with different views stand for, and win, lower level positions. Every voice changed lower down on the totem pole changes the presure on the people making decisions further up. Ultimately enough movement lower down means the top eschalons are pushed out and replaced too.

            Whether it’s possible to find enough candidates to start filling the party, I don’t know, but just focusing on the primaries (or lack thereof) for the top job is missing the wood for the trees.

            • meyotch@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              I volunteered this election with our state house district committee of the Democratic party. The grassroots is effectively neutered and you can believe that they are carefully managed to be sure nothing rises up that the national party cannot control.

              The Democrats are managed opposition.

              • notabot@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                Thank you for putting the effort in. The party apparatus isn’t going to want to change, but I’m not sure that it’s managed opposition as such, so much as those who are ‘in’ being happy with their lot and doing what they feel they need to to stop that being taken away.

                There’s two ways to use that to change the situation, either demonstrate that their comfortable position will be taken away if they don’t change their politics, or take it away by finding a candidate you can rally enough support behind. Neither is easy, and both require getting people involved en-mass at the lowest levels of politics, which is going to be hard work with the party pulling against you. It’s not impossible though, AOC and Sanders are both candidates of a different stripe and have, so far, held their places. Imagine how different things would be if they were replicated even a few times?

          • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            A Socialist party would not only not have a chance in hell, the votes it would siphon off would lead to a resounding victory for the Reich Wing. A strong Socialist candidate (or several) in the Democratic Primary wouldn’t win either, but would drag the debate to the left and force/enable the more moderate candidate to support the kinds of goals and programs that used to define the Democratic Party in order to win, without being labeled and dismissed as “Socialist” by swing voters. However, we’ve already seen what happened when leftists decided to sit out the General election because nobody was good enough for them.

        • cooperativesrock@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          At the presidential level, yes the DNC has been terrible with candidates. However they aren’t in charge of the other races. They can give money, but they can’t stop Socialists and other leftists running in primaries and winning them or general elections from school board to senator and everything in between. They can make it harder for these people to win, but they can’t stop or control city, county, or state elections. We need a base of elected officials pushing them to change their tack.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            However they aren’t in charge of the other races. They can give money, but they can’t stop Socialists and other leftists running in primaries and winning them or general elections from school board to senator and everything in between

            Okay I could be wrong, but can they not make up excuses bar whoever they don’t like from primaries? Or make up other excuses and run their own neoliberal candidate and split the vote anyway? They just… nominated Harris in 2024 so clearly they’re not obligated to even hold primaries.

            • cooperativesrock@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              The DNC doesn’t control state elections, the local democratic parties do. It is up to the state parties to run their primary (or caucus) as they choose. The DNC can influence primaries with spending, but they don’t make the rules for state-levrl primaries.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        No, it changes by having a chair that cares more about beating Republicans than beating progressives…

        And we have that now

        The fight over the party was over more than a month ago when the Chair election happened.

        Neoliberals lost, the party of today is not the same party as 2 months ago, the chair is basically a dictatorship with all the power and zero accountability

        • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Guess we’ll see. The only thing I’ve seen Dems (as a party) do in the past month is roll over and show their belly.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            You’re talking about elected politicians.

            That is not the DNC.

            Party leadership isn’t the DNC.

            For the past 30 years they’ve been intertwined, because we kept getting neoliberal chairs and the party leaders are neoliberals. And they worked together to prevent progressives from gaining ground.

            Ken Martin wasn’t born yesterday, you can look at Minnesota and what they did under his leadership as state chair, and the type of politicians who got to office with his help.

            He’s not perfect, but he won’t stand in the way of progress, and that’s all we need to get a non-neoliberal to the general in 2028.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        …which is the true goal of these “hello there, fellow leftist” bastards who exclusively attack Democrats.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          If they occupy the only space to defeat Trump and they do a bad job at it, of course they get “attacked.”

          If they don’t want to be criticized, they shouldn’t be public figures. If they don’t want to have people have actual reasons to call them out, they shouldn’t have and keep unpopular policies. If they don’t want to represent their people, they shouldn’t be in office.

            • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              Propaganda = criticism

              Got it, don’t call out your favorite team, they’re immune to critcism. Calling them out is woke propaganda. Sources proving them owned by corporations? DEI news Russian media.

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                Pretty much. It’s very rare to find a good faith criticism of Democrats on lemmy. All you have to do is ask what they think about Trump, or Russia. Usually you get a deflection, or crickets. Or [removed by mod]. Not allowed to criticize Dear Leader, only Democrats.

        • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          I think it’s the true goal of these “actually Joe Biden is great and you’re an idiot for thinking otherwise” bastards who exclusively attack leftists. Thinly veiled reverse psychology designed to piss people off into not voting or voting third party.

          • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            I’ll never get how they think critizing Democrats is a personal attack on them. I’ve never considered it despite being registered Dem for 99% of my time as a voter.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Sounds great. But maybe you should get out of your bubble every now and then to realize that a party full of open socialists would 100% fail in the US.

      I am aware of how popular Bernie’s policy goals are. It does not matter.

      • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        You might be right, but I also submit that, when talking to Trump voters (older family members of me and my friends mostly), instead of “proving them wrong” about Trump, I’ve been redirecting the conversation toward “isn’t all that bad stuff the fault of rich people?”, and it has had a 100% success rate so far. They fucking hate the wealthy too. They ain’t waving the red flag, but I bet a lot more of them would vote for someone just to screw over the rich than most people think.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yeah, but it does not matter. They will still vote Republican. At least the people I’m thinking of. I can’t speak for anyone else.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      you had something ti vote for that was radically different from trump

      you didn’t vote for it, you got trump

      simple

      Try actually voting

    • Vari@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 days ago

      “But please donate to my campaign to STOP this. We will soon, I promise”

      • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        My god I am so sick of the emails.

        I used to get emails like “Contribute to X because I will fight for our schools to provide school lunches to everyone!” And I’d donate.

        Now, the emails are just “Donald wants to kill education. GIVE ME MONEY.”

        So you can use that money to buy another sign that says “Pweeze stop”?

      • middgatsby@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        The amount of “gib monies plz” messages I got infuriated me. Like you aren’t doing diddly squat why would I ?!?

        • bigkatze@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          We got a make them actually work for their money. If they want us to donate then they should do something they said they would do.

        • aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          I think our society is ducked up enough that economically it makes better sense to have a loyal audience of easy marks than a wide audience of fickle donors. Donald Trump figures this out years ago and has been cultivating/brainwashing that audience since.

          Idk how to counter it except that maybe if we gave people cheaper/free essential goods (housing, school lunches etc) they’d be less inclined to go insane and support scammers like trump or the modern democratic party.

      • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Here’s a 100 texts from candidates running for city commissioner in TN and you live on the west coast.

  • Crikeste@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 days ago

    I don’t see people screaming at Bernie, AOC or Tim Walz. Wonder why that is…. Oh maybe it’s because they’re actually willing to notice the frustrations of their base.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      “Wait you want us to fight for your rights, like you elected us to do? I dunno, that sounds like effort. It’s much easier to agree to what Republicans want and it theoretically looks good on paper that we wanna work with Fascists. Maybe we’ll get some of their voters this time!”

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          "As we all know, we only do what we want when we win. Your house rep doesn’t still work when they win their seat, right? …They do? They still try to get things done?

          Well, uh, you know you can’t do what you want when you’re in the minority of Congress. Wait Republicans did exactly that for 15 years? And got all their demands with the filibuster and delaying?

          Well republicans would just use that as ammo for their messaging. Please ignore they’ll do anything we do as massaging, from tan suits to mustard. We have to give them what they want, there’s nothing else we could do!"

          • Lyrl@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            The Republican demands were to NOT do things, which can be moved towards by filibuster and delay. The Democrat demands are to DO things, and filibuster and delay would just get the Republicans what they want, while being able to blame the Democrats for all the negative effects that are surprising to their constituents. They need to find better messages and ways to get those messages out, absolutely, but it’s not a mirror image to the Republican situation four years ago.

        • C45513@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          we’re holding up ping pong paddles, there’s nothing else we can do!

  • Sorgan71@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 days ago

    Honestly instead of pushing me to the democrats, this has just gotten me to hate both sides, just hate one a little less.

  • kingie_d@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 days ago

    As an Aussie watching what’s happening over there, all I’ve got to say is that the days of honourable dueling are gone - your leaders need to understand that you’re in a dirty street fight now!

  • NovaOG@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 days ago

    Ah yes, the tru endgame of “the highroad strategy”. Simply doing nothing as the fascists pillage the Government. At least the Dems are holding their noses high as everything burns around them!

  • zenpocalypse@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 days ago

    Another constituent, Donya Williams, complained Ivey didn’t know the people in his district well enough — because he admitted earlier that he didn’t know who popular podcaster Joe Rogan was until the middle of the 2024 presidential campaign.

    This explains so much. They are as ignorant of the current state of things as the “apolitical” voters who thought Trump would be fine this time.

  • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 days ago

    We are alone in this. The dems are better, but they are at fault here too because their entire strategy is being better then the republican which allows Republicans to be as awful as they please

  • meyotch@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Lately my emotions have tended toward anger at the apathetic middle, not the cartoon villains of the Penguin Administration.

    I know it’s a minority view but I blame all this on the nice normal people that thought they had better things to do than pay attention to politics.

    If you do not see the need for aggressive responses to lawlessness, you let this happen and I find you boring.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      The former Berlin businessman I referred to earlier told me that he blamed his own group, people with the time and the money and the opportunity to know better, for what happened to Germany. “We ignored Hitler,” he said. “We considered him an unimportant fellow, not quite a gentleman, not of our own class. We considered it just a little bit vulgar to bother with him, to bother with politics at all.”

      They thought of the government as “They.” The only possible route to a clear conscience in politics is to accept political responsibility, either as an active member of the party in power or as an equally active member of the loyal opposition.

      Robert A. Heinlein, Take Back Your Government

    • orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      This has been my position since I was a teenager: centrists are the weak underbelly because they can’t pick a side and just want a middle ground.

      Great sentiment, but you never have a side, a cause, and your “meaning” is always shifting to placate everyone else in the name of middleness.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        To be fair to some of those people, they’re not all being unintentionally malicious. I used to call myself a centrist but that was in the transition phase between “conservative because everyone I know is” and “I have formed my own beliefs”. For most people that’s what the process of developing their opinions looks like. You don’t swing right from one extreme to the other. You take baby steps along the way. You start to see the cracks in what people around you are saying but you still mostly hear exaggerated caricatures of what the alternatives are so you’re sort of stuck in the middle because you don’t know where else it’s even possible to go.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Centrists are scum, but the truly disengaged “oh I don’t care about politics” people are much worse imo.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      On an article talking about how Dems failed voters…

      There’s always going to be someone blaming voters and saying asking for representation is undemocratic…

  • Triasha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    They need to understand that they are fighting for the country. And when they don’t treat the Republicans and billionaires as the enemy they deprive us of the power to fight at the ballot box.

    So we have to go to the soapbox. Like lemmy.

    And when that fails, many of us (not me) will find they have nothing else to lose and go to the ammo box, like mangione is accused of.

    And the rest of us will go to the jury box and vote not guilty.

  • guldukat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Ocasio-Cortez/Sanders 2028

    Democrats: No we need to do this

    This is why we lose. Fucking unite for something, geez

    • thepresentpast@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      I think Walz/Ocasio-Cortez would be a much more popular and palatable suggestion for the electorate, even though I personally prefer your proposal

    • C45513@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      if Americans are going to just sit and wait, the US won’t be recognizable in 4 years, and there sure as hell won’t be a free and fair election

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Many Americans are not. There’s protests happening everyday, across the country. It’s, not being talked about but it’s absolutely happening.

        • whiskeytango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Besides bluesky, can we start seeing more of the protests here on lemmy? And see it flood the pages here? If someone just posts one a day from each location, that will kick start enough people to join

          • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Be safe. Be discreet. The administration is violent right now and accelerating. They are violating civil and human rights. Get involved in your local offline chapters, please. These places are being watched too and pictures may be used to nab others that attend. They also may be used/posted for predatory reasons. Protect yourselves and your comrades in arms. Unless you know what you are doing (and even then think 2x), do not bring your phone to protests. Keep it charged in a place you frequent.

              • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                11 days ago

                It’s working when they don’t want people to see it. The revolution will not be televised. This isn’t something for media. That is cheap and doesn’t actually change things. People need to leave the house, build community, collaborate and organise, in person. Social media won’t protect you when ICE knocks, but a neighbour will. It’s not real life.

    • RufusFirefly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      I think after Biden and then Trump, people will be completely fed up with old white guys. I seriously doubt even Santa Claus could get elected. I’m in my 60s and a huge Bernie fan but we need some younger people on the ticket.

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I feel that Sanders is probably too old and that he can pass the torch on at the next election. It’s sad, but I still don’t think we need an 80 year old running for office.

      • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        nah fuck that. Bernie will go out in a blaze of glory, double middle fingers to the sky, falling straight from the oval office into a coffin after guaranteeing All Americans get equal access to universal healthcare and a secondary four year/vocational school education. He’ll take money out of politics and raise taxes on the 1% so hard they’ll revert back into normal fuckin people. He’ll invest in High speed rail, green energy, while simultaneously legalizing weed.

        The man has been working his whole life towards these goals, I say we help him get there.

  • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    I think we may may finally be getting our message across. Here’s why:

    Last night, Adam Schiff, one of the Democratic lawmakers I respect the most, was on Kimmel, and was very rough not just on the HitlerPig Crime Family, but also Chuck Schumer.

    But what really struck me, was that the very honorable, polite, and respectful Adam Schiff took the opportunity to basically say “Fuck You” directly to the president - TWICE!

    Kimmel asked him if he had said thank you to HitlerPig, and Schiff said he used a different two-word phrase, but one of the words was “You,” and everyone got it and laughed. At the end of his interview, he made another joke that was another very obvious disguised “Fuck You.”

    They were obviously baiting HitlerPig into a tirade, but seeing Schiff go on national TV and saying Fuck You to HitlerPig twice marks a very new direction in messaging for the Democratic party. I hope this is the beginning of pivoting from appeasement to Hard Ball.