This is going to have “downstream” impacts as well… For those poorer Americans that are “lucky” enough to have a space to rent out, that rent is going to get more expensive to cover the loss of income they need…

Between the social security, Medicare/Medicaid (I can never remember which is which) and this bullshit, my rent is about to skyrocket so my landlord can stay afloat. :/

I would laugh hysterically if news of his death lead to an immediate jump in the stock price as well.

I would also just be very very happy to not have to share the same planet with that opportunistic Nazi asshat.

You’re seriously misunderstanding my comment if you think I’m a tankie. Hell I even posted a comment in another thread mentioning my distaste for the “dictatorship of the proletariat” concept.

My comment was about the fact that we openly refer to a judges political beliefs to inform us of how we should feel about them because the judiciary has gotten so broken that we can essentially tell how a judge will rule based on their political leanings as opposed to simply following the law. I didn’t mean to say “we only have liberal and conservative judges” as some lamentation of the lack of leftist judges.

While that also sucks, it’s not really what I meant. I just hate that it’s come to the point that we need to identify the judges by their political leanings because that’s how they rule on cases as opposed to a straight interpretation of what the law says which is what they’re supposed to do.

If the judges have those personal beliefs and a case related to that comes before them I’d want them to consider the law not their personal beliefs, so we shouldn’t have to be identifying them in this way.

We’ve come to identify them by their political leaning because it has come to the point that we get rulings based on their political leaning as opposed to what the law says. Hell it’s why muskrat was pushing for “his” judge to win. He knew that the judge he backed would rule in his favor and we know he would have ruled in favor of Republicans plans for gerrymandering when that absofucukinglutly should not be the case. :(

I’m glad, but I’m still pretty damn irritated that we’re all seemingly “ok” with the fact that we just have “liberal” and “conservative” judges.

They’re supposed to be impartial. We shouldn’t be able to tell how they’re going to rule based on their political leaning, it should be purely about the law. :(

The ultra wealthy will face the consequences of their actions!

…it’s always nice to hope though. :(

Wisconsin “judicial” system:

for people with the wrong political ideologies

Here’s your time to shine Reich wing crybabies who were always complaining about “wrong think” when your racist posts got removed from Twitter or whatever! Show us you stick to your convictions!

…lmao no. It will be hypocrisy as it always is.

Boo fucking hooo. He had no issues when “Judge” rubber stamp Cannon was handed the most important cases he ever faced and held up to her name, literally defending him as opposed to actually being a judge…

Crybaby “strongman.”

“Listen, I’m just here so I could avoid getting arrested and so I can unleash my vengeance against those that would dare to hold me accountable to my actions. Whatever else happens, I don’t give a fuck. Money and no accountability, that’s what I want.”

That one? It seemed like every other case involving Trump went to her, it was disgusting to be able to call the outcome just by knowing she was the judge involved. :(

“I really don’t care do you?”

Wearing that while going to meet immigrant children.

Classy lady…

Republicans when they have power:

Democrats when they have power:

Why of course I understand this. Why wouldn’t I?

While I agree, I’m a “child of the internet” so pretty much any opposition research on me would have me murdered by probably everyone.

Maybe I should run. I could unite the left and right in their disgust of me lol

Democratic Party will only be changed through primaries

And that means it’s time for everyone to actually give a shit about voting in primary elections instead of just old people who keep choosing the worst candidates.

"Courts do not have their own armies or significant police forces. Yet leaders typically obey judges’ orders, because of the political costs of flouting them.

Usually, voters won’t reward their elected leaders for violating norms, disrupting a stable constitutional order, or taking actions that are intrinsically unlawful, said Aziz Huq, a law professor at the University of Chicago and co-author of the book “How to Save a Constitutional Democracy.”

But that calculus may not apply to Mr. Trump, who has based his political appeal on gleefully flouting sacrosanct norms. Refusing to accept courts’ authority may actually appeal to the president’s base, Huq said, if they take it as evidence of strength rather than lawlessness."

Two faced, hypocritical, tribal cult worshipping assholes: ThE pArTy Of LaW aNd OrDeR!

…my fucking ass you are.

He’s not clueless, he’s using this as an opportunity to play the victim and paint “the left” as the real problem. It’s all for Fox news viewers and the ignorant and it’s going to work. These people are masters at propaganda and manipulation. It’s disgusting how effective they’ve been

A-fucking-men friendo