Overtaxed and unpaid air traffic controllers are resigning “every day” due to stress from the government shutdown.

“Controllers are resigning every day now because of the prolonged nature of the shutdown,” Nick Daniels, president of the National Air Traffic Controllers Association, told CNN.

“We hadn’t seen that before. And we’re also 400 controllers short—shorter than we were in the 2019 shutdown.”

Air traffic controllers are federal workers, which means they are part of the approximately 730,000 federal employees working without pay since the shutdown began on Oct. 1.

  • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    shorter than we were in the 2019 shutdown.

    Ah, so there was a shutdown in 2019 as well. Anyone know if there was anything in common between 2019 and 2025? In, idk the American government or something? Any important people in common between 2019 and 2025?

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I actually think this is a risky play for the ruling class because the average USian rarely flies. It is the wealthy management class of the US that utilizes airline travel extensively, and their jobs are useless and in large part unnecessary.

    What happens when the business shell game of moving naive idiots with expensive watches around on jets to give the appearance of important business happening is shattered when the people who do actual work in this country keep showing up and getting real work done while the management class is utterly grounded from flights being cancelled en masse?

    If I was part of the ruling class this would be making me VERY worried.

    • BigPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, the country is on fire sale. They’re loading up to head to greener pastures. Destroying US flight means that an alternative they’ve invested in can rise. Just wait until ATC globally is done in Chinese instead, then it’ll make sense.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The first time I’m reading about this. If the situation were reversed Republicans would be on every show everywhere repeating this taking point.

      Democrats need to fucking hammer the Republicans on this 24/7 on every outlet possible.

        • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          If so the Democrats could act like it by showing what happens when they try to say what they aren’t allowed to say.

          At which point you could say that the Democrats are owned by the far right, at which point “far right” becomes an impractical phrase to use to distinguish between the likes of AOC and Mamdani and the likes of Trump.

          So no, the news media aren’t owned by the far right. They are owned by the same people that own the Democrats and Republicans, which have a diverse range of right wing opinions none of which include stopping fascists that got elected through the system that they rely on for their wealth and power.

          If the DNC wanted to hammer the Republicans on this, then by the same token the news media would want to let them. But the DNC doesn’t want to encourage opposition too much because they know they and their owners would lose massive amounts of money if there was any kind of structural reform.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        “Best we can do is fund spoiler candidates after our boy lost the NYC democratic primary”

    • digredior@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      They should propose a bill that makes a lapse in appropriations trigger a CR so there’s no need for a shutdown.

        • TRBoom@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          59
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Continuing resolution. Basically if they can’t make a new budget the old one gets used.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                19
                ·
                3 days ago

                God, that sounds so nice. If you play these stupid games then you instantly end up on the chopping block. That fixes so many issues.

                • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  To be fair, our FPTP system does tend to create majority governments so this wouldn’t ever be an issue then as they can pass anything they want. We might be having an election though if this current minority government budget fails which it might.

                  It’d be nice if we could move to proportional representation though as majority governments are almost always with well less than 50% of the vote and vote splitting fucks things up for center/ledt parties and let’s the conservatives win more because they consolidated into 1 party including all the extreme right whackjobs

              • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                22
                ·
                3 days ago

                Good point. That definitely disrupts things to some extent – but the government doesn’t literally stop everything, AFAIK. Don’t departments still get their funding throughout, until the new government passes another budget?

                • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  No, you are right, things don’t just stop when that happens. I imagine funding could lapse if it was about to lapse, but just because there isn’t a budget passed yet doesn’t mean its immediately going to lapse.

                  If we somehow had a budget fail, and for some reason took 6 months to have an election (would never happen), we might run into funding issues?

          • 5too@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 days ago

            Didn’t have that until a decade or so back? Thought I remembered we switched to this system so Republicans could reevaluate each time/hold everything hostage…

      • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Leadership believes they would be unable to cobble together enough votes to pass a budget if there wasn’t the threat of a shutdown to hang over the Representatives.

        Voters in the US tend to elect Representatives who are unwilling to compromise. Being obstructionist is rewarded with way better re-election chances than getting anything done. Voters want to see their candidate Stand Up To The Enemy, although they will accept passage of a Perfect Bill (as annointed by their media of choice). Passing a bill that is later deemed by their media of choice to have any small non-perfection gets them primaried and booted. So any candidate that doesn’t have extensive cover for passing a budget, that by its nature has to be a compromise, is replaced by a more obstructionist person.

        • smeenz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Not really. You’re coming at it assuming the point of the system is to benefit the majority of the people. It is not., and the people who do benefit have a vested interest in ensuring things do not change.

          • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            And things ended up this way because in 1776 they had little idea of how their rules were going to play out but they had to choose something to get started and they hoped it would get fixed with time.

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), who introduced a bill to pay both federal workers required to work during the shutdown and those who are furloughed. This proposal was supported by several unions representing federal workers but was ultimately blocked by Senate Democrats. https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/07/politics/shutdown-congress-federal-pay-vote

      So I’m confused. Was this another bill?

      E: https://lemmy.world/comment/20388431 helped clear that up a bit. Thanks friend.

      • paranoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        The bill is called “The true shutdown fairness act”, and it is a poorly named response to the republican “shutdown fairness act”.

        The main differences between the bills (which aren’t really covered in the news, but you can read the bills) is that the shutdown fairness act was limited to excepted employees (those who have to work without pay), as well as some military personnel and some contractors. But it gave trump discretion about who could get paid, and did nothing for furloughed employees, nor guarantee all service members or contractors get paid (again, because it allowed trump to pick and choose)

        The true shutdown fairness act aimed to ensure all federal employees and service members get paid, and prevent mass firings during the shutdown. I don’t know/understand why this bill was rejected (I’ll edit if I can find anything)

        This post and this post go into a bit more detail.

        Edit: I can’t find a news article with direct quotes, but this is part of the ai overview (so take it with a grain of salt)

        Underlying reasons: Democrats opposed the Republican bill because they felt it would grant the President too much power to decide which employees would be paid and which would not. Republicans, in turn, blocked the Democratic bill, with Johnson expressing concern that it would limit the President’s ability to manage the government and potentially reduce the workforce.

  • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Get out now, the government is never reopening and this will be our new future.

    This is the small government the GOP base wanted.

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Kinda hope THIS government never reopens but I’m not going to leave, I want to help establish the “something better” that’s going to come after this shit is gone.

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    No government: good for the people oppressed by the State

    No planes: good for the climate.

    • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      Unfortunately, the “people” benefiting most from less state “oppression” are corporations.

      The rest of the people are still being plenty oppressed e.g. by masked goons claiming to work for the government. Shutdown or no shutdown.

      Meanwhile, the government is literally letting people starve for political reasons.

      As for the planes, I agree.

      • quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yes, it seems that we’re focusing on the wrong thing here

        The narrative shouldn’t be parties diagreeing on policy (to get the gov up again). The narrative should be on why the fuck we’re letting ICE and the executive continue to operate during a shutdown, and how we’re going to force them to cease and desist

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      no government means no one’s being paid to stop assholes who need enforced laws to keep them from fucking over humanity. Look at how bad it is now *with government and laws *

  • stringere@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    3 days ago

    I hope we can all agree that people should not be furloughed or working without pay during this shutdown but something I haven’t seen reported on is the effect this will have on economies locally and nationally.

    Napkin math so someone correct me if needed:

    • 4.5 million furloughed or working without pay.
    • Average salary I found was $68,000 but let’s use 50,000 to account for the top paying jobs probably still getting paid.
    • That gives us $4,166 monthly.
    • For each month of shutdown that comes to $18,747,000,000 that isn’t being spent

    While I’m sure most of us Americans could do with less consumption, I can’t help but wonder how many small businesses are going to suffer from this. This is especially true for areas with large amounts of federal employment.

    • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Small businesses were already disproportionately suffering from the capricious tariff situation. And areas with large federal employment specifically were already suffering from the Doge chainsaw layoffs. This administration is just piling it on.

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 days ago

      There are actually projections for the economic downturn to come that do and don’t factor in the government shutdown reaching thanksgiving, then Christmas. So it is being considered in terms of consumer spending as a whole, but you mentioned small businesses specifically, and they are the ones that will be hurt more than anyone in what’s to come. Although, I’m seeing more and more local-only-economies pop up, where you all try to keep money within the network of the community.

      The projections I saw were for the economy to level off by 1Q 2026, but if the shutdown reaches Christmas, it’ll actually shrink an entire point.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    3 days ago

    WHY can’t these GREEDY Air Traffic Controllers just BUCKLE DOWN so until we can CONFIRM that STARVING CHILDREN WILL NOT BE GETTING FOOD and that HEALTH CARE INSURANCE WILL BECOME UNAFFORDABLE FOR AMERICANS?

        • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          3 days ago

          Ahh Reagan, he may not be the only one that caused us to get to where we are, but he did a phenomenal job teaching the next generation how to fuck up everything for everyone.

          • can_you_change_your_username@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            3 days ago

            He’s pretty much directly responsible for the atc problems. Their union went on strike during his presidency and he did mass firings and union busting. It takes years to fully train and qualify an atc and the job has an incredible amount of stress. They aren’t easy to recruit and train. We’ve had a national shortage of atc since his firings. If he had negotiated with them in good faith we wouldn’t have had a sudden shortage that we couldn’t catch up from then and their working conditions would have improved making them easier to recruit and train.

            • Yeather@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              So to be fair, it was illegal for them to strike. No government worker, federal, state, or local, is allowed to strike. This is why blue outs (originally police all calling sick at the same time but now applied to all government workers) are a thing.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            3 days ago

            So many of today’s problems are because of the Confederate Party, and the kinds of things they did and the things they schemed about since Nixon and since Ronnie Raygun especially.

            They were thoroughly outraged that Nixon had to resign in complete disgrace and vowed to combat that in the media space at least. Ronnie Raygun’s maladministration helped to enable that with the dismantling of the Fairness Doctrine…

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        3 days ago

        The very last thing you want on a job is old timers who have been through terrible situations and know shortcuts and tricks to get through it.

        Institutional memory? Bah! We have MBA’s!

      • LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        I mean I wouldn’t want to have a federal position now…. Who knows when you could next be expected to work with no pay for a month or more because a bunch of fascist babies aren’t quite getting their way.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I say good. People need to feel this and they need to know exactly why it is happening. It needs to be undeniable.

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sounds like no one invited you anywhere for Thanksgiving.

        Funny how some people are always ready to have other folks suffer for a good cause.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Lol yeah you got me.

          I have to believe that you are purposely misconstruing my comment. I don’t want any of this to happen. I have, however, been paying close attention to politics for over two decades now, and I know what it takes for even a small % of these people to ever consider changing their minds about politics.

          These people are pathologically stubborn in the face of new evidence. They will do the exact opposite of what a scientist says they should do simply because they made them feel stupid for suggesting they might know better.

          They also believe empathy is evil, and therefore a huge chunk of them are literally incapable of grasping something until it affects them directly. We’ve seen it happen over and over and over again.

          • Ava@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Right, but the issue here is that nobody agrees on who is at fault. Nobody is given reason to change their minds, because it’s “the other side” causing it, regardless of which side they’re on. It’s a problem that is definitely affecting real people, but “we’re not the ones causing it” is an easy way to ignore responsibility.

            That’s not to say the shutdown should end, or that it isn’t obvious that the administration isn’t willing to come to the table, but I don’t think I agree with your above point that there’s anything undeniable to be found.

    • eletes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Pretty sure this is the plan though, privatize and sell it to Trump’s buddies. Wouldn’t be surprised if Palantir or Oracle had a product in development.

      In may Duffy announced equipment overhauls, they could have tapped a company around then too

  • BetaBlake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m sure this is Bidens fault somehow right? Isn’t that usually how this goes, blame Biden for some shit that has nothing to do with him?

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well…if he had gotten the justice department to actually nail Trump, then we might have avoided this.

      • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        If Kamala had declined to support genocide… If Obama had prosecuted the 08 banking criminals… If Gore had contested the 2000 election…

        As awful as the Republicans are, we must remember that the Democrats have always succeeded at making sure their colleagues across the aisle never face too severe consequences. After all, that would make dinner on Thursday quite awkward.

  • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Good. I hope America grinds to a fucking standstill. And that as a result of it, traitorous cowards like Fueher Shitshimself never see the light of day, let alone any position of authority.

    • Shadow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      3 days ago

      He’s not paying the military either, not sure how well that’ll work for him.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Didn’t some billionaire step up to pay the military? Because that sounds like such a great fucking idea. What could go wrong.

    • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Given my expectations of the regime, they will be fully staffed by military ATC.

      Military ATC is not Civilian ATC.

      This is going to be a worse shitshow than I anticipated just in air travel.

      • Yeather@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Trump believes he can do what Reagan did. The only issue is the current ATC system is 16000 comtrollers compared to 12000 in the 80’s and the military has around 3500 controllers which is almost identical to the number in the 80’s. There is no way the military can cover the same traffic as civilian controllers can, and unlike Reagan the current world is much more reliant on air travel.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    At least I’m guessing those unpaid federal workers won’t vote republican for the rest of their lives