PinkyCoyote@sopuli.xyz to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agoTook me a momentlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square37linkfedilinkarrow-up1606arrow-down110cross-posted to: AntiMeme@sopuli.xyz
arrow-up1596arrow-down1imageTook me a momentlemmy.dbzer0.comPinkyCoyote@sopuli.xyz to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square37linkfedilinkcross-posted to: AntiMeme@sopuli.xyz
minus-squareFauxLiving@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·edit-23 days agoSide note, this reminded me that 3blue1brown just started a series on the Laplace Transform if you’re into the further antics of e. e(heh): forgot a link https://youtu.be/-j8PzkZ70Lg
minus-squaresomerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·3 days agothe first thing that comes to my mind is the euler’s number the second one is
minus-squaretetris11@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-23 days agoSecond thing is Euler’s Product Formula, which is just amazing in it’s definition. Zeta(s) = Sum(over all integers) [ 1 / ns ] = Product(over all prime numbers) [ 1 / 1 - p-s ] That “over all prime numbers” part gets me every time, and yet the statement is provably true
Side note, this reminded me that 3blue1brown just started a series on the Laplace Transform if you’re into the further antics of e.
e(heh): forgot a link https://youtu.be/-j8PzkZ70Lg
the first thing that comes to my mind is the euler’s number
the second one is
Second thing is Euler’s Product Formula, which is just amazing in it’s definition.
Zeta(s) = Sum(over all integers) [ 1 / ns ] = Product(over all prime numbers) [ 1 / 1 - p-s ]
That “over all prime numbers” part gets me every time, and yet the statement is provably true
Super cool video