Rikudou_Sage

When two people kiss, they form a long tube from one anus to another.

Not really on any significant scale.

Ah, so reporting stuff he said as if it was true, even though this is not a Signal security issue, but his incompetence is fine in your book?

So what, if Trump says random bullshit, every news piece about it should sound like they actually agree with what he said?

Okay, enjoy your articles about Signal security issues.

I don’t particularly care about your fish or your frying.

And are you going to call both a “bank security issue”?

So you’re gonna pretend that’s your first interpretation of the meaning of the sentence, huh?

Edit: Also, that’s wrong interpretation of what happened either way, guess the title doesn’t work even if you’re intentionally obtuse.

Nope, it’s not. The part saying “the only glitch in two months” is indicated as a quote, but overall the title sounds like there’s a security issue in Signal and Trump chose to dismiss it because it’s the only glitch in the last two months.

Sure, but I don’t really care what that idiot thinks. When I read an article about there being a “Signal security failure,” I expect there to be a Signal security failure.

Nah, the idiot is the one who spreads misinformation by using misleading titles. In what world did a “Signal security failure” occur? The title is extremely misleading and one can only hope it was incompetence; not intent.

What Trump calls things should be irrelevant to a news site.

Which idiot created the title?

For anyone interested: there wasn’t any Signal security failure, someone sent stuff via Signal to people they shouldn’t have.