Hopefully. If the US leaves NATO and then attacks, article 5 can be triggered.

If they attack before leaving NATO I don’t believe article 5 can be used.

Unfortunately Canada would love more territory but I think we would have to refuse unless everyone who voted for Trump left the state beforehand.

I mean, what are they going to do when the plane approaches the runway without permission, shoot down the vice president of the United States? They didn’t really have much of a choice. I doubt the Americans would have turned around once refused.

Someone also needs to start a fourth party at the same time which is socially left but fiscally right. A lot of conservatives don’t give a shit about the social aspect of the Democrats but just like the financial side of Republicans more so they vote that way instead.

A 4 party system is better than 3 party, and this way instead of a third party syphoning votes from only Democrats you’ll have another party syphoning votes from Republicans at the same time so there’s no downside.

Can it get any worse?

The decision needs to be made right now, because there are always going to be those that encourage voting 3rd party like 3 months before the election even though none of the groundwork has been done for the previous 4 years.

If the work is started now it’s a lot better then 3 months before the election where it really just syphons votes away from at least preventing Republicans from winning.

How would elections even work if there were three parties? Doesn’t there need to be a majority for the president to be declared? Or is that because of the current two party system? Does it just need to be the party with the most electoral votes, not over 50%?

If there were three parties and it ended up being 33/33/34, would the party with 34% of the electoral votes be the one to win the presidency?