IndridCold@lemmy.ca to politics @lemmy.world · 6 days agoTrump, 79, Claims It’s ‘Illegal’ for Late-Night Host to Mock Himwww.thedailybeast.comexternal-linkmessage-square89linkfedilinkarrow-up1648arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1640arrow-down1external-linkTrump, 79, Claims It’s ‘Illegal’ for Late-Night Host to Mock Himwww.thedailybeast.comIndridCold@lemmy.ca to politics @lemmy.world · 6 days agomessage-square89linkfedilinkfile-text
https://archive.today/?run=1&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thedailybeast.com%2Fdonald-trump-claims-its-illegal-for-late-night-host-seth-meyers-to-mock-him%2F
minus-squarerunning_ragged@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up28·6 days agoHe does care about the law, just in the conservative way. “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit
minus-squarexxce2AAb@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·6 days agoI don’t disagree with you, but I see no reason to amend my statement.
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·5 days agoClassic case of both of you being right so yeah 🤷🏻
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·5 days agoWhy would you think anyone felt you should amend your statement
He does care about the law, just in the conservative way.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
I don’t disagree with you, but I see no reason to amend my statement.
Classic case of both of you being right so yeah 🤷🏻
Why would you think anyone felt you should amend your statement