• just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Anyone involved with the legal response or not releasing these funds can be arrested and held in contempt of court. This would obviously apply to Trump lackeys, and not himself. Do this a couple dozen times, and his entire cabinet has nobody to enforce their bullshit.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The local police who are deferential to the judicial. That’s how and why they can arrest people. The executive does not decide this.

        Am I living in a universe where people just aren’t tought these things in school?

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I don’t know what universe you’re living in, but it isn’t the normal one because you’re wrong.

          The local police are part of the executive branch of the local government. Not judicial.

          That fundamental lack of understanding goes a long way to explain why you keep delusionally insisting that judges can enforce the law.

    • EndOfLine@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Arrested by whom? Isn’t it the executive branch that controls the enforcement of laws and judicial decisions?

      Serious question. What power does the judiciary have to enforce their rulings.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        No. Absolutely not.

        You also don’t have a fundamental understanding of how the constitution works.

        Do you know what the three branches of government are and what they are responsible for? This is grade school stuff.

        • NewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          My guy, you are right that this is taught in grade school civics class. But that isn’t the zing you think it is.

          The legislative makes the law The judicial interprets the law The executive enforces the law

          Judges can’t enforce anything. They need people from the executive side to do the enforcing.

          You keep repeating the same misinformation throughout this post and are getting the down votes for it.

          • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Exactly why I qualified my statement with “enforce the law”.

            Never said they make the law.

            Its pathetic that people are even commenting on very basic things regarding the constitution here.

            Although the text of the take care clause “seemingly invests the office with broad enforcement authority,” it also limits the executive’s power. As the Constitution Annotated notes, the clause “underscores that the executive is under a duty to execute the laws of Congress faithfully and not disregard them.”

            The executive is not there to enforce anything except what Congress has already passed. You can’t make shit up and decide that up is down and yellow is green at your leisure.

            • NewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              One more time

              The judicial interprets, not “enforces”.

              The executive doing their job wrong doesn’t change this.