stephen01king

Why are you changing the subject? You said there were more effective protesters that are not being covered. Can you link them for me?

It does when you’re acting like you know better than the protesters, yet have done nothing that is actually better. Actually, you have not even proven that you’ve done anything even on par with them.

Everyone know keyboard warriors have a point, yet everyone also know they are keyboard warrior because they lack the courage to do what they expect others to do. In that sense, you are just a hypocrite unless you prove yourself to not be one. Your use of specific terms to explain things don’t change the fact that nobody listens to people who tell others to do things they are not willing to do themselves. Talk is cheap, even if it’s based on the truth.

Who are these people? Got any links?

If they do exist, I think you’ll find it more effective to spread the word about them instead of trying to pull down other people. You won’t find acceptance amongst the general public if all they see you do is pull down others. Be more effective in your own messaging.

Again, what have YOU done?

I never defended these protests. I only told you how to make your point actually stick, which is by showing what you did personally that was more effective than what they did. It’s you who failed such a simple task and made yourself look like a completely useless keyboard warrior.

Not saying they couldn’t do better, but they are for sure doing more than the guy not doing anything other than criticise the way of people protest on the internet.

Those are people, not you. What did you do that gives you the right to say what other people do are useless? What did YOU do that was more effective.

Doesn’t matter how effective other’s actions are, because they are in a far better position than people who do nothing but criticises other people’s actions.

You keep saying about what they shouldn’t do, yet you have not listed even one thing you’ve already done that is better than things you’re calling as performative. If you want to prove your point, just list these things and explain how they’re more effective than protesting.

Even if I don’t look for it, US politics is everywhere on this site. If you feel that non-US citizens shouldn’t talk about US politics, then stop talking about it so much and assuming every random person you talk to is from the US.

Even as an outsider, I could see the inevitable loss of the Democrats in 2024 from the way their most zealous supporters act. The question is why aren’t you people seeing it? This is the why blindly defending a political party doesn’t do you much good. You become detached from reality. So detached in fact that you’re still doing the same thing after your party already lost the election.

I’m not American, so none that you know. I was just one of the ones warning against blindly accepting the Democrats refusal to call out a genocide as well as warning not to attack people who are pushing back.

I never advocated for not voting for them, but surprise surprise, if your political party don’t represent the people and they’re not allowed to criticise that, the only result is voter apathy. So congrats.

So campaigns work by prioritising money over humanity? No wonder your party lost. You can’t outdo Republicans at being inhumane.

If only she cared enough about democracy to denounce a genocide. Unfortunately, she loved lobbyist money more than she loved democracy.

I don’t understand how that’s a counter to his point. Can you explain?