• 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 7th, 2025

help-circle



  • I recently looked into this on another forum where someone shared some articles supposedly proving bias. One article was itself highly biased to the right, so not particularly credible.

    The other article, from an organization that ranked the bias of news sources, was very neutral and objective, took accusations of bias seriously, went into detail, and removed the “unbiased” classification from Wikipedia, but didn’t conclude any provable bias, leaving it unranked. The best example of bias they had was the fact that articles on socialism and communism didn’t list Soviet atrocities, but those atrocities have their own pages and are also mentioned on pages of the countries involved, so that was not a great example.

    All these accusations are just the result of a massive right-wing campaign against facts and reality-based reporting. Everything that doesn’t follow their propaganda is biased, according to them.









  • Does he personally own 10% of Intel now? Or does the US government? From my understanding it’s the government, which makes it a kind of partial nationalisation.

    It was absolutely a dirty deal, and Trump and his flunkies are enriching themselves, but I don’t see how Intel is enriching them.

    Even so, it smells more of the kind of incestuous business-government relationship you get in fascism than the nationalisation for the people you get in socialism/communism. The US govt now has a special interest in one particular corporation that can be counted upon to do its bidding without a legal framework, while Intel can count on special treatment from the government while still being mostly privately owned.

    But that’s not going to stop me from throwing this nationalisation in the faces of anti-socialist Trump supporters. Let them figure out and explain it’s more like fascism than socialism.